Many of us have been laboring in the Lord's Pro Life vineyard for a long time. The work certainly has it's ups and downs but what keeps us going is the face of the child we see that was spared from a death sentence or the grateful tears of a mother or father who has found healing and forgiveness post abortion. So as we start on another 40 Days for Life Campaign we do well to remember how far we have come locally. As one of our parishioners who has been on the front lines recently reminded me:
From the time the first African slave arrived on our shores in 1619, until the Emancipation
Proclamation in 1863, 244 years passed. It took another hundred and one years for the Civil
Rights Bill. We have been in this fight for just 42 years.
Since 1982 our community has participated in prayers at abortion clinics, first at the clinic
on Rural Road just south of Mt. Carmel church. Thanks be to God, that clinic has closed
its doors. Next, we prayed at the clinic on Broadway just west of Tempe High School.
Thanks be to God, that clinic has closed its doors. Now, we can pray at the Planned
Parenthood Clinic very close to us on Apache Blvd., just east of Rural Road. It has already
cut back its hours and is now closed on Sundays and Mondays.
Because of 42 years of prayer and education, the rate of abortion and its ratio to live births
are at their lowest points since 1973, when Roe v Wade was enacted. Real progress is being made!
I'll march my band out, I will beat my drum,
And if I'm fanned out, your turn at bat, sir,
At least I didn't fake it, hat, sir,
I guess I didn't make it.
Get ready for me, love, 'cause I'm a " comer,"
I simply gotta march,
My heart's a drummer.
Nobody, no, nobody
is gonna rain on my parade!
Fanny Brice isn't the only one to like a good parade. And one of the grandest of them all is the New York City St. Patrick's Day Parade. However this parade has a new route: it will now march down that one way street called "tolerance and inclusivity" more commonly known as Make it Gay Way.READ MORE
If you are not an Opera fan but would like to venture into this wonderful musical genre a good place to start is with the Opera Pagliaccio by Leoncavallo. It is a simple, easy to follow work in two acts. It starts out with a Prologue that reminds the audience that actors have feelings too and that this story is about real people. Act One ends with the very famous operatic piece "Vesti la giubba", as one of the clowns sings the well-known aria, Laugh Clown laugh, in which you can almost taste his pain. Underneath the grease paint and costume is some real dark pain:
sul tuo amore infranto!
Ridi del duol, che
t'avvelena il cor!
for your love is broken!
Laugh of the pain, that
poisons your heart!)
Part of the fall-out from the sexual abuse cases that plagued the Church was that many jurisdictions tried to include in the mandatory reporting requirements any real or suspected abuse heard during the Sacrament of Reconciliation. Debate about this was pretty intense in Ireland and Australia but never got to the level of legislation. One of the reasons the issue never really got traction is that it is a rarity for a victim of sexual abuse to make the claim that they reported the abuse allegation while making a sacramental confession.
But now one such case has arisen in the Diocese of Baton Rouge, Louisiana. The victim of the abuse told authorities that a Church employee abused her and that she revealed this to her parish priest during a confession. The local prosecutor has subpoenaed the priest to testify as to whether or not he heard the girl’s confession and if so did she reveal the abuse to him as she claimed and what he said or did about it. The priest has refused to testify as this would violate the seal of confession and the issue is on Appeal to the US Supreme Court.
Obviously for us this is a clear First Amendment issue about the free exercise of religion. The confidentiality of the sacrament of Reconciliation is absolute in the Roman Catholic tradition and has been for centuries. A priest can reveal nothing he has heard within a confession, nor can he act upon what he has heard (even if the penitent tells the priest he is leaving a bomb in the confessional that will explode in one minute the priest can take no action based on that information), nor can he disclose the identity of anyone whose confession he has heard even if the penitent gives the priest permission to do so. It is important to remember that the priest cannot insist that the penitent do anything that would cause him or her to reveal publicly their sins. He can suggest but not make it a condition of absolution. There are no exceptions to the rule and violators incur excommunication that can only be lifted by the Pope himself. Traditionally courts have respected the absolute nature of the confessional or sacred communications between religious ministers and their members and in cases where they did not priests have been jailed and even executed for their refusal to violate the seal of confession.READ MORE
The existence of Christian communities in the Middle East and elsewhere has become more and more precarious and now in many places in Iraq there are no longer any Christian communities. This is a stunning development as these communities were able to survive the ups and downs of history for over 1600 years. What does that say about our age?
The Chaldean Catholic Archbishop of Mosul Archbishop Amel Nona (the Chaldean Catholics are one of the branches of the Catholic family and one of the most ancient) said this recently:
Our sufferings today are the prelude of those you, Europeans and Western Christians, will also suffer in the near future. I lost my diocese. The physical setting of my apostolate has been occupied by Islamic radicals who want us converted or dead. But my community is still alive.
Please, try to understand us. Your liberal and democratic principles are worth nothing here. You must consider again our reality in the Middle East, because you are welcoming in your countries an ever growing number of Muslims. Also you are in danger. You must take strong and courageous decisions, even at the cost of contradicting your principles. You think all men are equal, but that is not true: Islam does not say that all men are equal. Your values are not their values. If you do not understand this soon enough, you will become the victims of the enemy you have welcomed in your home.
You probably have noticed the sprouting of signs urging you to vote in the upcoming Primary/Special Election in Tempe on August 26. I certainly urge you to be a faithful citizen and cast your ballot. The Center for Arizona Policy has a voter's guide that you can download at azvoterguide.com to help you gather some info on the candidates and other issues that are on the ballot as they relate to issues important to people of faith.
Most of us receive lots of postcards in the mail asking us to support this or that candidate. But one caught my eye; it was from the Mayor and two Tempe Council members urging me to vote YES on Prop 475 so that we "keep Moving Tempe forward" and "strengthen our great reputation". This ballot proposition amends the City Charter. Amending a City charter or a constitution is usually a pretty serious matter, which got my attention, so I was curious as to what Prop 475 is all about.
Here's the exact Ballot Proposition (the old language has a strike through it and the new language is in caps): "No person shall be appointed to, removed from, favored in any way or discriminated against with respect to any city position because of race, sex, political or religious affiliation, COLOR, GENDER, GENDER IDENTITY, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, RELIGION, NATIONAL ORIGIN, FAMILIAL STATUS, AGE, POLITICAL AFFILIATION, DISABILITY, OR UNITED STATES MILITARY VETERAN STATUS, EXCEPT AS SUCH FAVOR MAY BE AUTHORIZED BY LAW."READ MORE
Well, it's back to school for one and for all. The young ones start school for the first time, others are making their way through the various grades, some are finishing their last semesters, others are matriculating through college or university and the rest of us can enroll in our new Bible Class here at Mt. Carmel.
As I look across the educational landscape I see that All Sex University, colloquially known as ASU is listed as the campus with the most STD's, and that's not an academic degree. I wonder if that is included in the In-State Tuition Rate or is it just a free extra? Incidentally the same University is rated as the 4th most Promiscuous College in the US. I guess they will have to try harder to earn the numero uno spot. While I'm not sure how those ratings are had (www.viralsip.com), but sadly they don't really surprise me.
But for those students who may not be interested in getting an STD there are some good alternatives. The ASU Newman Center has a new building and some great programs for students. Also St. Paul Outreach continues to operate on campus a Women's House and a Men's House for students who want to live in a faith inspired environment. SPO also has lots of outreach to the larger campus.
I also see that some elementary school students at one school in Washington, DC are going to learn a new lesson called "Equity, Inclusion, and Caring" better know as Reality Denial. Apparently when they return to school one teacher, Mr. Robert Reuter will now be Ms. Rebecca Reuter. I wonder what will happen when a 10yr old boy blurts out, "that's not a woman it's a man dressed as a girl". Will he be disciplined, suspended, sent to sensitivity training? Children are taught that when an adult makes them feel "creepy" they should tell another adult since this could be a sign of an abuser. How will this one be handled? This lesson in "subtle and explicit gender identities" subverts common sense. We will not be teaching this lesson at our school. (http://eppc.org/publications/back-to-school-when-mr-reuter-becomes-ms-reuter/)READ MORE
Last time I checked there were 30 ways to make a baby these days. The "birds and the bees" talk obviously takes a lot longer. One of the more recent ways to have a child is through commercial surrogacy. That is when a couple pays to "rent a womb" of a third party to "gestate" a child and then by contract to give that child to the paying couple. This arrangement is fraught with problems and unfortunately reduces a child to a commodity.
There has been an explosion of "Surrogacy Agencies" for couples that can't or won't have a child. This represents the worst kind of entrepreneurial capitalism. Recently, the Washington Post reported that in one such arrangement the biological parents refused to accept one of the twins born of the surrogate or "gestational carrier". As the Post reported:
A Thai surrogate mother said Sunday that she was not angry with the Australian biological parents who left behind a baby boy born with Down syndrome, and hoped that the family would take care of the boy's twin sister they took with them. Pattaramon Chanbua, a 21-year-old food vendor in Thailand's seaside town of Sri Racha, has had to take a break from her job to take care of her 7-month-old surrogate baby, named "Gammy," who also has a congenital heart condition. The boy, with blond hair and dark brown eyes, is now being treated in a hospital for infection in his lungs.
The view that this Australian couple had was more akin to manufacturing a child and since one was defective they simply returned the merchandise. This sad situation also underlines one of the elitist cultural values that is pervading our society: "I have a right to a child and to the kind of child I want". Seeing a child as a gift, the fruit of love seems so blasé these days.READ MORE
How long should it take to die, or more precisely how long is too long? That is the question that is being asked in several states including Arizona as recent executions using lethal injection have taken much longer and possibly have been much more painful as the executioner has access to only two of the three drugs normally used for executing a condemned prisoner.
The drug, sodium thiopental is no longer produced in the United States and most European countries have banned pharmaceutical companies in their countries from selling the drug in the US. This follows a long campaign by death penalty opponents to pressure drug companies to stop making the drug available for use in executions. Thus we see the law of unintended consequences at work. I am sure it was not the intention of death penalty opponents to make executions more difficult or more painful but that wound up being one of the unintended consequences.
The use of lethal injection as a method for execution is probably not the best method to employ for a variety of reasons. From the start no one knew what combination of drugs and at what dosages they should be used at would make killing a basically healthy person quick and painless. Even though now it has been tried and tested we really don’t know if it is painful and it still takes lots longer than other execution methods. It also puts medical personal in the unacceptable spot of participating in the killing of a human being. And as we watched recently in Arizona without medical expertise the execution could easily be botched or violate the 8th Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment.READ MORE
I think we have a new psychiatric condition: Hobby Lobby Hyperbolic Hysteria Disorder. The campaign of disinformation that has followed the Hobby Lobby/Conestoga Woods Supreme Court decision is both astonishing and disingenuous. The fact that the families who run these companies are not Catholic but Evangelical Christian hasn't stopped their opponents from fomenting all sorts of anti-Catholic bigotry. I originally thought it was a good thing that the Court did not take for review one of the lawsuits from a Catholic business owner as it would open the Justices, six who are Catholic, to all sorts of accusations of imposing Catholic teaching on the country. Even though the case did not involve Catholic business owners Catholic bigotry has been on full display.
The hysterics I have heard include: women will have lots less sex and lots more babies or the 5 men on the Supreme Court are denying women access to birth control. No such thing happened. What the Court did was retain the status quo, the way it was before some government technocrat issued the "contraception mandate".
I also heard Sen. Barbara Boxer from California bitterly complain that Hobby Lobby denies women contraception but provides men with Viagra. Is this Senator dumb as a bucket of spit? Someone needs to let her know that Viagra is not a form of birth control but is prescribed to treat a legitimate medical condition. While contraception actually does not treat a medical condition in fact it shuts down a women's otherwise healthy functioning fertility. Then there was Sen. Reid from Nevada castigating the 5 "white" men on the Supreme Court, which was certainly news to Justice Thomas. And Rep. Nancy "I call myself Catholic but should be Episcopalian" Pelosi who warned us all to be "very afraid of the men on the Supreme Court".READ MORE
While we have been overwhelmed with the faux hysteria over the Supreme Court's Hobby Lobby decision and also amused at the mind-numbing stupidity of so much of the commentary that insists we are heading towards a theocracy with those 5 Catholic men on the Supreme Court, many of us may have missed the other small victory in the Court's unanimous decision to strike down the Massachusetts law that required buffer zones around Abortion Clinics in order to keep the Pro-Life sidewalk counselors at bay.
The Court ruled that the law as written went too far in restricting the Pro-Life counselors. As I have written before Pro-Life protestors are the only group of protestors that are routinely singled out again and again for unequal treatment. These laws are never targeted at Union protestors, Occupy Wall Street protestors or any other protestor for that matter. Apparently Justice Scalia agrees with me and in his concurring opinion took Chief Justice Roberts, who wrote the decision, to task for the logic he used to reach the decision, stating very unambiguously that Robert's rationale continues "this court's practice of giving abortion-rights advocates a pass when it comes to suppressing the free-speech rights of their opponents." In essence Justice Scalia is saying that the court reached the right conclusion but for the wrong reasons. I concur.READ MORE
Opinions on what to do about Immigration and Border issues in our country are often formed by the heart without the head or the head without the heart. The first leads to an ooey-gooey form of feel-good-ism that only furthers the problem and the latter offers a sterile response that reduces people to a commodity. And as I have pointed out previously, the current political parties have no interest in really fixing the problem since it is such an effective political battering ram that they can use against each other. But in the meantime thousands of children are streaming across our border as a direct result of our current immigration policies.
The WHY is pretty simple: coming to the US offers opportunities that these children would never have in their home countries. In his recent speech on Foreign Policy given at West Point, President Obama disappointingly never mentioned Latin America. It would seem to me that it is in our national interest to help the poor countries to our south develop economically. That might reduce the need for people to flee their home countries. The conditions must be pretty bad for parents to seriously jeopardize the lives of their children to send them on the dangerous and uncertain journey to the US.READ MORE
This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing Government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it or their revolutionary right to dismember or overthrow it.
—Abraham Lincoln: First Inaugural Address, 4 March 1861
I quote President Lincoln on this Independence Day Weekend not as a suggestion but as a reminder that the direction of our country is yet in our hands to shape. Admittedly many of us are growing weary of the existing Government whose policies hollow out the First Amendment protections of religious freedom. It appears more and more that the "separation clause" that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, applies only to Christianity. And the guarantee that the government will not "prohibit the free exercise thereof" is no longer had by default but by long fought legal battles.READ MORE